Vine maturity was significantly correlated (P-value Towards chromosome 4, the three QTLs was indeed from the 66 Container plots showing the results of the marker genotypic categories (AAAA, AAAB, AABB, ABBB, BBBB) of 4 candidate SNPs toward tuber sugar amount (GLU); bud-end fry colour (FBE); stem-tuber fry color (FSE); ID, Idaho The co-localization out of several QTLs within maturity locus area within data is similar to the observed designs out-of phenotypic correlations. 01) with quite a few traits overlapping a similar hereditary condition (Fig. 1). Such as, EBID11 and you will VWID11 ratings each other exhibited a strong negative correlation having MAT95ID and you may MAT120ID. It trend may give an explanation for major impression QTL with later on readiness directly associated with defer start of VW and EB, or alternatively, very early readiness ultimately causing early onset of VW and you will EB. A fairly higher correlation was also observed between vine readiness and you may growth behavior, having early readiness from the alot more distributed growth habit. Conversely, a reduced relationship (r ? 0.2) ranging from vine readiness and one another tuber glucose quantity and bud-end fry color was in keeping with different models towards QTL outcomes. Tuber glucose, bud-avoid and you will base-stop fry color Including chromosome 5, tall QTLs to own sugar, bud-prevent and you can stalk-avoid fry color was basically observed inside the overlapping aspects of chromosomes 4, 6, ten, and you can eleven. 0 cM toward LOD ratings ranging from 4.5 to 6.0 (Table step three, Fig. 4). These types of QTLs told me anywhere between seven.2 and eleven.3% of characteristic variance. Investigation of various simple habits indicated one better-fitted model for everyone around three qualities, having a double-simplex allele (AAAB ? AAAB) for the homologous chromosomes H2 and you will H5 from RGR and Advertising, correspondingly (Dining table step 3, A lot more document 8: Profile S4). To have sugar, the fresh B allele is with the higher sugar concentration, when you’re for bud-stop and stalk-end fry colour, the clear presence of the new B allele indicated all the way down reflectance viewpoints (Fig. 3b). LOD score shipping regarding QTLs for three characteristics over the 12 potato chromosomes (Chr). Abbreviations is actually like in Fig. step one A candidate SNP for a double-simplex configuration on H2 and H5 is solcap_c2_12976 at position 67.4 cM. On the reference PGSC v4.03 Pseudomolecules, this SNP maps to the long arm of chromosome 4 at position 69.1 Mb on the F-box and WD40 domain protein gene (PGSC0003DMG400003339), which is close ( On chromosome 6, significant QTLs mapped at 53 cM for glucose and at 43 cM for FBE and SBE, respectively. The LOD profiles ranged from 5.4 to 7.6 and explained between 10.8 and 16.1% of the trait variance, respectively (Table 3, Additional file 9: Figure S5). The best model for all three traits was a double-simplex configuration with allele effects on H2 and H5. As in chromosome 4, the presence of the B alleles was associated with an increase in glucose concentration and a decrease in reflectance readings (Fig. 3c). There are four candidate SNPs with a double simplex configuration nearby (solcap_snp_c2_33777, solcap_snp_c1_10130, solcap_snp_c2_5769, solcap_snp_c2_56145, c1_3003). All were significantly (P-value seven Mb) that has had several genetics of starch/glucose inter-sales plus hexokinase (HXK-6, PGSC0003DMG400016521), fructokinase (FRK-6/1, PGSC0003DMG400027017, FRK-6/dos, PGSC0003DMG400026916), and you will invertase (INV-na-6/step one, PGSC0003DMG400026107, INV-6/dos, PGSC0003DMG400033142) genes.
Towards chromosome 4, the three QTLs was indeed from the 66
Container plots showing the results of the marker genotypic categories (AAAA, AAAB, AABB, ABBB, BBBB) of 4 candidate SNPs toward tuber sugar amount (GLU); bud-end fry colour (FBE); stem-tuber fry color (FSE); ID, Idaho
The co-localization out of several QTLs within maturity locus area within data is similar to the observed designs out-of phenotypic correlations. 01) with quite a few traits overlapping a similar hereditary condition (Fig. 1). Such as, EBID11 and you will VWID11 ratings each other exhibited a strong negative correlation having MAT95ID and you may MAT120ID. It trend may give an explanation for major impression QTL with later on readiness directly associated with defer start of VW and EB, or alternatively, very early readiness ultimately causing early onset of VW and you will EB. A fairly higher correlation was also observed between vine readiness and you may growth behavior, having early readiness from the alot more distributed growth habit. Conversely, a reduced relationship (r ? 0.2) ranging from vine readiness and one another tuber glucose quantity and bud-end fry color was in keeping with different models towards QTL outcomes.
Tuber glucose, bud-avoid and you will base-stop fry color
Including chromosome 5, tall QTLs to own sugar, bud-prevent and you can stalk-avoid fry color was basically observed inside the overlapping aspects of chromosomes 4, 6, ten, and you can eleven. 0 cM toward LOD ratings ranging from 4.5 to 6.0 (Table step three, Fig. 4). These types of QTLs told me anywhere between seven.2 and eleven.3% of characteristic variance. Investigation of various simple habits indicated one better-fitted model for everyone around three qualities, having a double-simplex allele (AAAB ? AAAB) for the homologous chromosomes H2 and you will H5 from RGR and Advertising, correspondingly (Dining table step 3, A lot more document 8: Profile S4). To have sugar, the fresh B allele is with the higher sugar concentration, when you’re for
LOD score shipping regarding QTLs for three characteristics over the 12 potato chromosomes (Chr). Abbreviations is actually like in Fig. step one
A candidate SNP for a double-simplex configuration on H2 and H5 is solcap_c2_12976 at position 67.4 cM. On the reference PGSC v4.03 Pseudomolecules, this SNP maps to the long arm of chromosome 4 at position 69.1 Mb on the F-box and WD40 domain protein gene (PGSC0003DMG400003339), which is close (< 2 Mb) to several genes associated with starch/sugar inter-conversion as annotated in the potato reference genome, and/or associated with tuber quality traits . They include alpha amylase (AMY-4/1 PGSC0003DMG400007974, AMY-4/2 PGSC0003DMG400009891), hexose transporter (HT-4/3, PGSC0003DMG400009994), invertase (NV-4, PGSC0003DMG400009936), and starch branching enzyme I (SBE I, PGSC0003DMG400009981).
On chromosome 6, significant QTLs mapped at 53 cM for glucose and at 43 cM for FBE and SBE, respectively. The LOD profiles ranged from 5.4 to 7.6 and explained between 10.8 and 16.1% of the trait variance, respectively (Table 3, Additional file 9: Figure S5). The best model for all three traits was a double-simplex configuration with allele effects on H2 and H5. As in chromosome 4, the presence of the B alleles was associated with an increase in glucose concentration and a
seven Mb) that has had several genetics of starch/glucose inter-sales plus hexokinase (HXK-6, PGSC0003DMG400016521), fructokinase (FRK-6/1, PGSC0003DMG400027017, FRK-6/dos, PGSC0003DMG400026916), and you will invertase (INV-na-6/step one, PGSC0003DMG400026107, INV-6/dos, PGSC0003DMG400033142) genes.