Manresa Y Navarro, Comentarious al Codigo civil espanol, vol
Ex lover zona Tormes, 53 R. 396, 399 (1938) (estimating J. Ma. 6, 501). Brand new «concubinage even more uxorio» is in fact omitted. Discover Sanabria v. Assistant off Health, Degree and you will Interests, 390 F.Supp. 538 (D.), aff’d, 530 F.2d 961 (first Cir. 1976); Barbosa de Rosario, Consideraciones dentro de torno al concubinato, las comunas y el derecho de- familia, 42 Rev.Jur.U. 345, 360-63, 367 (1973).
Which difference in means to fix purposes of possessions devolution are significant enough to rob appellant of the benefits associated with 42 You.S.C. § 416(h)(1)(A). Neither can the reality that appellant is good widow at the death give her straight back within this one to part having 9 weeks from legal wedding are required. Their unique constitutional «equivalent security» assault into the 9-few days criteria is incorrect around Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749, 95 S.Ct. 2457, 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975), and you may Matthews v. S. 181, 97 S.Ct. 431, 50 L.Ed.2d 389 (1976) and therefore upheld comparable distinctions. For this reason, we can’t, beneath the public defense rules, allow healing.
«The expression ‘widow’. . . setting the newest surviving partner of an individual, however, on condition that . . . she is hitched to help you your to own a time period of not less than 9 months quickly ahead of the date about what the guy passed away. . . .»
De- Castro, 429 U
1. The newest judge capability of employing activities. 2. Its agree. 3. Agreement and you can affair off an effective matrimonial price depending on the forms and you may solemnities prescribed by-law.»
Section step one. — That after one and you may a lady publicly live together inside a similar domicil following technique of wife and husband and you can children are produced on it this is why thereof, particularly connection, if your functions thereto feel the courtroom requisites and you will capability to bargain wedding just in case no legal obstacle can be found, shall for all purposes feel kept and you can deemed getting good legitimate relationship which have all municipal aftereffects of another legal
It is obvious the conditions of Post 69 were not fulfilled nine days before appellant husband’s dying. And is also equally clear one to Blog post 69 cannot consider conditions. Indeed, in the event the Puerto Rico Legislative Construction immediately after needed to understand some common-laws particular marriages, they noticed they had to enact a separate laws regarding purpose. One to law, the new Operate out of February a dozen, 1903, discussed «sheer relationship» and centered a procedure so you can legitimize and you will sign in such unions. Serves and Resolutions of your own Basic Session of your own Area Legislative Installation 116-118 (1903). However it try brief-resided. Regulations of 1903 try repealed with the February 7, 1906. Serves and you may Resolutions of your own Second Course of your Third Legislative Set-up 106 (1906). And no most other similar law has been enacted regarding the Commonwealth subsequently. Consequently, we believe the newest Commonwealth process of law do ending one appellant wasn’t legitimately married so you’re able to Mr. Montanez Figueroa, the new dead employee, 9 days in advance of their death.
P.Roentgen
The fresh heredity liberties off a good widow, however, concern another portion of the possessions acquired during the marriage; in