A national Study of Norwegian Values Regarding the Exact same-sex Relationship and you may Lesbian and you may Gay Parenthood
The latest Norwegian Gender-Neutral Marriage Legislation
Within the Norway, an effective gender-basic , replacing a law toward Inserted Partnership which was lead inside the 1993 (Ministry out of Students, Equivalence and you can Societal Introduction 2009a, b). The latest laws secure equivalent wedding and parenting rights to possess lesbian, gay and heterosexual partners, such as the right to submit an application for adoption. Lesbian people was indeed provided the legal right to end up being assessed getting state-backed artificial insemination tips and you may co-motherhood might possibly be provided to the new spouse of your own physical mom. Brand new Norwegian county church and other spiritual teams from inside the Norway employed reservation legal rights with
In Norway, we have witnessed several changes in the fresh court reputation regarding homosexuals once the removal of male homosexuality from the Violent Code into the 1972. Two decades later on, in the event the Law to the Entered Relationship try put, lesbian and you will gay people had been in particular granted an equivalent legal rights because heterosexual people with the exception of chapel weddings, joint use and you will condition-paid helped fertilization (Halvorsen 1998). The newest , at the same time, brought modern regulations regarding instance legal rights, also it renders zero distinction considering gender, with the exception of scheduling liberties in terms of church wedding receptions. Now, Norway is considered probably one of the most liberal countries about world regarding securing equal rights to possess heterosexuals and you may homosexuals (Anderssen and you may Hellesund 2009; Badgett 2004) and you will is the original
Heterosexual College Students’ Perceptions Into the Same-Sex People and you may Mothers Around the Eight Europe
The general public discussion at that time leading up to Norway’s the latest gender-neutral Marriage Law secure a spectrum of information about elizabeth-sex partners, however, generally centered on lesbian and you may gay parenthood (Folgero, 2008) and whether it was at the newest newborns best interest to present lesbian and gay couples the ability to getting parents. Rivals of one’s the newest Relationship Laws argued your suggestion is actually not inside agreement to the best interests of one’s youngster and you can that lesbian and gay liberties (mature rights) got consideration more than youngsters’ rights. Brand new thoughts you to broadening up with lesbian and you will gay moms and dads create place an extra strain otherwise weight toward youngster is actually then promoted. Biological bonds and a beneficial heterosexual atomic nearest and dearest which have both men and you can female character models had been thought to be requirements to have a healthier ecosystem to possess youngsters (Anderssen and you may Hellesund 2009; Folgero 2008; Suggestion nr. 33 2007–2008). Followers of your own offer, in addition, emphasized an equal rights and a fairness position. They contended the gender-neutral Marriage Legislation perform facilitate liberty regarding discrimination for pupils elevated into the lesbian and you may gay relationship whilst in standard preventing prejudiced and you can moralizing notions about the lesbian and you will gay parenting and you may college students expanding upwards which have lesbian and gay moms and dads. Followers subsequent expressed a conviction one to an excellent parent’s sexual positioning are not related to their unique/their ability to bring proper and you can nurturing ecosystem getting students (Folgero 2008; Proposition nr. 33 2007–2008). However, various communities argued there ended up being diminished search on outcomes getting children following the provisions to have equal parenting rights for lesbian, gay and you can heterosexual partners about new gender-neutral Marriage Legislation hence these types of hadn’t received adequate said. 2005).